The original copy of this report is available in downloadable MS Word format from: www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/plans/clean_air_plans.htm
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY
SECTION 111(d)/129 STATE PLAN
FOR LARGE MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS (MWCs)
Table of Contents
Pages
I.
Background/Introduction
3
II.
Public Participation
4
III.
Implementation of the
Section 111(d)/129 State Plan
6
IV.
Emission Standards and other
Requirements
7
V.
Compliance Schedule and
Increments of Progress
10
VI.
Inventory of Designated
Facilities
13
VII. Emission Inventory For Designated Facilities
13
VIII. Source Surveillance, Compliance Assurance and Enforcement 14
IX. Legal Authority to
Implement the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan 16
The emission guidelines established emission levels for MWC organics (dioxins/furans), MWC metals (cadmium, lead, mercury), particulate matter (PM and opacity), MWC gases (hydrogen chloride and sulfur dioxide), nitrogen oxide, and MWC fugitive ash emissions. Subpart Cb also established requirements for operating practices (carbon monoxide, load, flue gas, temperature at the PM control device inlet, and operator training/certification). Compliance must be achieved within three years after approval of the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan by EPA or December 19, 2000, whichever occurred earlier.
On December 6, 1996, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the 1995 standards and guidelines because the standards failed to require an evaluation of individual MWC units on a unit-by unit basis to determine whether the combustors exceed the 250 tons or more of waste per day capacity. The standards were vacated in their entirety and remanded to EPA for further proceedings because counsel for EPA stated at oral argument that the 1995 standards needed to be vacated in their entirety if the Court decided that MWC units had to be recategorized by unit capacity, Davis County Solid Waste Management District v. EPA, 101 F. 3d 1395 (D.C. Cir 1996).
On February 4, 1997, EPA filed a petition for rehearing on the remedy portion of the Davis opinion, requesting that the Court only vacate the standards and guidelines for cement kilns and combustion units with capacities less than or equal to 250 tons per day. On March 21, 1997, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an order and opinion which remanded the standards and guidelines for large MWCs to EPA for recalculation of the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) floors for large combustors. Davis County Solid Waste Management District v. EPA, 108 F. 3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997). Existing large MWC units with a combustion capacity greater than 250 tons per day must comply with the Subpart Cb requirements. On August 25, 1997, EPA promulgated supplemental emission limits for lead, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride and nitrogen oxides because of the revised MACT floors. See 62 Federal Register 45116 (8/25/97). As a result of the Davis decision, the Subpart Cb requirements apply solely to existing large MWC facilities with capacities greater than 250 tons per day.
State plans must include a schedule for compliance with Subpart Cb requirements. All designated MWC units for which construction was commenced after June 26, 1987 must comply with mercury and dioxins/furans emission limits within one year following the issuance of either new or revised federally enforceable state operating permits (FESOPs) or within 1 year following EPA approval of State Plan, whichever is later. The designated large MWC units must comply with the other 1995 emission standards by December 19, 2000. Because of the revised MACT floors, designated facilities must also achieve compliance with the supplemental emission limits for lead, sulfur dioxide, and hydrogen chloride no later than August 26, 2002, or 3 years after EPA approval of the state plan, whichever is first (see 62 FR 45118).
The procedures for adoption and submittal of State Plans are codified in 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart B. The Subpart B provisions were amended by EPA to include specifications that supersede the provision in Subpart B regarding the schedule for submittal of State Plans under Section 129 of the Clean Air Act, the stringency of emission limitations, and the compliance schedule. The Section 111(d)/129 State Plan must be as protective as the Subpart Cb requirements.
The State Plan for large MWC units in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been developed in accordance with Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act. This State Plan includes a demonstration of legal authority, identification of enforceable mechanisms, an inventory of MWC units and emissions, compliance schedules, closure requirements and emissions limitations. As required under 40 CFR Parts 60, Subparts B and Cb, the plan also contains testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements, a record of the public hearing, and provisions for the submittal of annual progress reports to EPA related to compliance and enforcement.
January
7, 1998 Southeast
Regional Office
Time: 2:00 p.m. Main
Conference Room
555
North Lane, Suite 6010
Conshohocken,
PA 19428
January
8, 1998 Rachel
Carson State Office Building
Time: 1:00 p.m. 2nd
Floor Auditorium
400
Market Street
Harrisburg,
PA 17105
The Department also provided notice of the date, time and location of each hearing to EPA, local air pollution control agencies and any state in the interstate region whose air quality may be affected by emissions from MWCs subject to the Subpart Cb requirements.
Persons interested in providing testimony on the proposed Section 111(d)/129 State Plan were required to notify PADEP at least 10 days prior to the hearing to reserve an opportunity to provide testimony. The Department requested that each witness provide three written copies of the oral testimony presented at the hearing.
The public hearings, which began at 2:00 p.m. (Conshohocken) on January 7th and at 1:00 p.m. (Harrisburg) on January 8th were attended by representatives from industry, local government agencies and environmental groups. Testimony was provided by the following: Andrew Szurgot, Vice President, Safety and Environment, American Ref-Fuel Company, Tim Porter, Director, Air Quality Management Wheelabrator Environmental Systems Inc., Jane Garbacz, Citizen Anetha Lue, Environmental Coordinator, Montenay Montgomery Limited Partnership and Maria Zannes, President of Integrated Waste Services Association. A copy of each person's testimony is available for review by the public and will be maintained by PADEP for at least 2 years.
Interested persons were also invited to submit written comments on the proposed State Plan to the Department on or before January 16, 1998. In addition to testimony received at the public hearings, written comments were submitted by Makeba Morris, Chief, Technical Assessment Section, EPA Region III, Daniel Lispi, Project Manager, Harrisburg Materials, Energy, Recycling and Recovery Facility, Glen Hoag, Facility Manager, Ogden Martin Systems of Lancaster, Inc., Jason Rash, Clean Air Council, David Vollero, Manager, York County Solid Waste & Refuse Authority. A Comment and Response Document which addresses the comments received during the public participation process has been prepared by the Department. Copies of the public hearing notices, listing of public hearing attendees, transcripts of the public hearings, written comments and the Comment and Response Document are attached hereto as Appendix B.
In accordance with 40 CFR §60.23(f)(1), the State Plan for large MWCs includes a certification that the public hearings were held in accordance with the criteria specified in 40 CFR §60.23(d). The public hearing certification is attached hereto as Appendix B-2 (relating to public hearing certification).
The Department will either issue new federally enforceable state-operating permits (FESOPs) or amend existing FESOPs for MWCs to incorporate the applicable requirements in 40 CFR Part 60. Finalized permits will be submitted to EPA no later than June 30, 1998. The revised or newly issued FESOPs issued to owners and operators of existing MWCs will implement the Subpart Cb requirements. The emission guidelines, adopted and incorporated by reference in 25 Pa. Code §122.3 (relating to adoption of standards), will serve as the legally enforceable mechanism to implement the Subpart Cb requirements. For purposes of meeting the requirements of the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan, FESOP terms and conditions, developed pursuant to 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts A, B, Cb, and Eb will be non-expiring and will continue in full force and effect until modified by the Department. Each FESOP will include a reference to applicable definitions in Subparts A, B, Cb, and Eb. Subsequently, FESOP terms and conditions will be included in Title V permits as "applicable requirements."
Subpart Cb requirements for existing large MWCs will be implemented by the Department as follows:
PADEP will also provide notice to MWC owners and operators, the EPA, any state within 50 miles of the facility and any contiguous state whose air quality may be affected by a designated MWC plant. The owner or operator of the MWC plant will publish notice of the FESOP, Title V permit or plan approval on at least 3 separate days in a prominent place and site in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the designated facility is located (see 25 Pa. Code §§127.424 (b) and 127.521).
In accordance with Section 129(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act, Section 111(d)/129 State Plans must include MWC emission limitations of metals, acid gases, organics, and nitrogen oxides that are "at least as protective" as the limitations codified in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Cb. The MWC emission limitations are incorporated by reference in their entirety in 25 Pa. Code §122.3 (relating to adoption of standards). As a result, the emission standards in the Commonwealth's Section 111(d)/129 State Plan for MWCs are identical to the standards in 40 CFR §60.33b (relating to emission guidelines for municipal waste combustor metals, acid gases, organics, and nitrogen oxides).
The owners or operators of designated facilities must comply with emission limits at least as stringent as the emission limits shown below by December 19, 2000. The owners or operators of designated MWC units for which construction was commenced after June 26, 1987 must comply with mercury and dioxins/furans emission limits within one year following the issuance of new/revised federally enforceable state operating permits (FESOPs) or within 1 year following EPA approval of State Plan, whichever is later. In addition, the large MWC units must comply with the "supplemental emission limits" for lead, hydrogen chloride, and sulfur dioxide no later than August 26, 2002, or 3 years after EPA approval of the Plan, whichever is first. The emissions discharged to the atmosphere from large MWCs shall be as least as stringent as the limits for the following pollutants:
Lead -- 0.44 milligrams per dry standard cubic meter, corrected to 7 percent oxygen (40 CFR §60.33b(a)(3). Compliance must be achieved by August 26, 2002, or 3 years after EPA approval of the Plan, whichever is first.
Sulfur dioxide -- 29 parts per million by volume or 25 percent of the potential sulfur dioxide emission concentration (75 percent reduction by weight or volume), corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis), whichever is less stringent. Compliance with the emission limit is based on a 24-hour daily geometric mean (40 CFR §60.33b(b)(3)(i)). Compliance must be achieved no later than August 26, 2002, or 3 years after EPA approval of the Plan, whichever is first.
Hydrogen Chloride -- 29 parts per million by volume or 5 percent of the potential hydrogen chloride emission concentration (95 percent reduction by weight or volume), corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis), whichever is less stringent. (40 CFR §60.33b(b)(3)(ii)). Compliance must be achieved no later than August 26, 2002, or 3 years after EPA approval of the Plan, whichever is first.
Nitrogen oxides -- 250 parts per million by volume, corrected to 7 percent oxygen on a dry basis for mass burn rotary waterwall MWC technology.
Nitrogen oxides -- Emissions averaging in accordance with the procedures in 40 CFR §§60.33b(d)(1)(i) through (d)(1)(v) for the following:
Mass burn waterwall technology -- 185 parts per million by volume, corrected to 7 percent oxygen on a dry basis.
Mass burn rotary waterwall technology -- 220 parts per million by volume, corrected to 7 percent oxygen, on a dry basis.
The emission standards and other general requirements for large MWC units are summarized in Appendix C (relating to emission standards and general requirements) and shall apply to all designated large MWCs at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown or malfunction as required under 40 CFR §60.58b(a).
Fugitive Ash Emissions [§60.36b] -- Visible emissions of less than 5 percent of the observation period (i.e., 9 minutes per 3 hour period) as determined by EPA Reference Method 22 as specified in 40 CFR §60.55b. The fugitive ash emission limits include visible emissions discharged to the atmosphere from buildings or enclosures of ash conveying systems.
The emission limits required under 40 CFR §60.55b do not apply to visible emissions discharged inside buildings or enclosures of ash conveying systems or during maintenance and repair of ash conveying systems (40 CFR §60.55b (b) and (c)).
Section 60.35b provides that a State Plan must include MWC operator training and certification requirements at least as protective as the requirements in 40 CFR §60.54b. Therefore, an owner or operator of a designated MWC facility subject to Subpart Cb shall comply with the standards for MWC operator training and certification according to the schedule set forth in 40 CFR §60.39b(c)(4).
Final Control Plan: No later than 6 months after PADEP issues FESOP
Award Contract: No later than 12 months after PADEP issues FESOP or plan approval under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, whichever is later
Initiate Construction: No later than 18 months after PADEP issues FESOP or plan approval under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, whichever is later
Complete Construction: No later than 30 months after PADEP issues FESOP or plan approval under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, whichever is later
Final Compliance: For mercury and dioxins/furans, compliance no later than one year after PADEP issues a new or revised FESOP permits or within 1 year following EPA approval of the MWC State Plan, whichever is later, for designated MWC units which were constructed after June 26, 1987
For other designated pollutants compliance no later than December 19, 2000, and August 26, 2002 for supplemental limits or 3 years after EPA approval of the Plan, whichever is first
Initial Performance Tests: No later than 180 days after final compliance
Reports of performance Annually after compliance date, if in compliance data and CEMS data: Semiannual reporting if emission limits are exceeded
The owner or operator shall achieve compliance with all applicable Subpart Cb requirements on or before December 19, 2000 or cease operation no later than the said date. The owner or operator of the designated facility may not restart any designated MWC unit at the facility until the designated unit has been retrofitted with emissions control equipment capable of meeting all of the emission limitations and operating requirements of 40 CFR Subpart Cb upon startup.
At a minimum, final FESOPs, Title V permits or plan approvals issued by PADEP to MWC owners or operators will include the following increments of progress:
The MWC State Plan will include one set of increments with compliance dates applicable to all large MWC units within Pennsylvania. When necessary, the compliance dates may vary from one MWC unit to another to address specific issues relevant to individual MWC units. The Department will submit a revised State Plan to EPA whenever a FESOP is revised to reflect a compliance schedule other than the schedule set forth in the original State Plan submittal. In all cases, the enforceable increments of progress will be arranged chronologically, and the compliance dates will be set to ensure full compliance with the applicable requirements as expeditiously as practicable (§60.24(c)). If a designated MWC unit fails to meet the above increments of progress for good reason (i.e., act of God, late equipment delivery), the owner or operator of the designated facility shall submit a request for an amended schedule. The request shall include the reasons for failing to meet the increments of progress.
Designated MWC facilities must achieve compliance with all applicable requirements by December 19, 2000. However, designated facilities have the option of complying with the Subpart Cb requirements or discontinuing operations by the final compliance date. No designated MWC facility or unit may operate in Pennsylvania after December 19, 2000, unless it is equipped with a Department-approved control device capable of meeting the emission standards in Subpart Cb.
Under the provisions of 40 CFR §60.39b, and EPA's July 1996 document entitled, Municipal Waste Combustion: Summary of the Requirements for Section 111(d)/129 State Plans for Implementing the Municipal Waste Combustor Emission Guidelines, a State Plan may include provisions for an MWC unit to cease operation and restart as part of its retrofit schedule. In a case where an MWC facility (which may include multiple units) requires such extensive construction that the work cannot be completed within a three-year timeframe, a closure agreement may be included in the plan which would require the unfinished MWC unit(s) to close at the end of three years and not reopen until construction is complete. Performance testing of the unit(s) covered by the closure agreement must be completed within 180 days of reopening.
All designated MWC units which plan to cease operation are required under 40 CFR §60.39b(c) to cease operation within three years following approval of the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan, but no later than December 19, 2000. For MWC units planning to cease operation later than one year after EPA approval of the State Plan, PADEP will submit to EPA a legally enforceable "Closure Agreement." The Closure Agreement, executed between the Department and the owner/operator of the designated MWC units, will include the date operation will cease, and a requirement to submit data from dioxin/furan emission tests per Section 60.39b(c)(2) of Subpart Cb. Any Closure agreement that is not included in the original Section 111(d)/129 State Plan will be submitted to EPA as a revision to the State Plan.
MWC units which plan to restart, may not restart without meeting the requirements of the Emissions Guidelines, Subpart Cb. Prior to restart, all applications, proposed plan approvals, and operating permits issued by the Department for the restarted MWC units will be submitted to EPA for review and approval.
MWC units that have already ceased operations will be identified in the inventory. MWC units that will cease operations within one year of approval of the MWC State Plan will also be identified and the year the unit ceases operations will be specified. If the MWC unit does not cease operation by that date, enforcement action will be taken. Since the inventory is a component of the MWC State Plan, any unit designated to cease operations in the inventory may not operate without a revision to the State Plan and must take actions to achieve compliance with the emission limits. Where MWC units have ceased operation, but will restart, the facility owner or operator must incorporate increments of progress for the unit and complete its air pollution control device retrofits before restarting.
The summary of applicable emission standards in Appendix E (relating to emission summaries from large MWC units) and the corresponding measured or estimated emission rates for each of the MWC units covered by this State Plan contains the most recent stack sampling results and sample dates are provided, where available. In cases where no stack test data exists, emission estimates were determined using the estimation methods from EPA's July 1996 document, Municipal Waste Combustion: Summary of the Requirements for Section 111(d)/129 State Plans for Implementing the Municipal Waste Combustor Emission Guidelines. Where emission estimates are used, the word "estimate" appears in place of the stack test date in Appendices E-1 through E-6. Applicable emission standards may vary, depending on the size of the facility and the type of air pollution controls used on the MWC units.
Post-1990 Dioxin/Furan Test Data from Large MWC Facilities
In accordance with 40 CFR 60, Subpart Cb, Appendix F (relating to post 1990 dioxin/furan test data from large MWC units) contains total dioxin/furan emission data for every MWC unit at each large facility that will require more than one year beyond EPA approval of this plan to comply with all of the standards and conditions of Subpart Cb. Section 60.39b(c)(2) provides that "if the State plan requirements for a large municipal waste combustor plant include a compliance schedule longer than one year after approval of the State plan, the State plan submittal shall include performance test results for dioxin/furan emissions for each designated facility that has a compliance schedule longer than 1 year following the approval of the State plan, and the performance test results shall have been conducted during or after 1990." The performance test must be conducted according to the procedures in Section 60.38b.
The post 1990 dioxins/furans data from the designated facilities are presented in Appendix F. Except for Unit I of the Harrisburg Materials, Energy, Recycling and Recovery Facility, the data represents an average of the post 1990 dioxins/furans emissions. The emissions data is an average of all the unit-by-unit stack tests for a given year.
Except as provided under 40 CFR §60.24(b)(2), the compliance and performance testing requirements applicable to designated MWC units are at least as stringent as the provisions in 40 CFR §60.58b. EPA must approve the use of any equivalent test method in accordance with the requirements in 40 CFR §60.8(b). Pursuant to §60.38b(b), the alternative performance testing schedule for dioxin/furan specified in 40 CFR §60.58b(g)(5)(iii) shall apply to large municipal waste combustor plants that achieve a dioxin/furan emission level less than or equal to 15 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter corrected to 7% oxygen.
The owner or operator of an affected large MWC shall install, calibrate, operate and maintain continuous emission monitors for carbon monoxides, oxygen, opacity, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur dioxide. At a minimum, the MWC owner or operator must:
In order to be approved by EPA the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan must include legally enforceable procedures to require MWC owners or operators to maintain records and to periodically report to PADEP the "nature and amount of emissions" from the designated facilities. For compliance purposes, owners or operators of designated MWC units must maintain records and provide reports in accordance with the requirements in 40 CFR §60.59(b) as applicable, except for the siting requirements in 40 CFR §§60.59b (a), (b)(5), and (d)(11).
Subsection 60.25(e) requires States to submit reports on progress in plan enforcement to the EPA Administrator on an annual basis, beginning with the first full report period after EPA approval of the MWC State Plan. The progress report must be included the reports submitted in accordance with the CFR §51.32. The annual progress report will describe PADEP's progress in the enforcement of the State plan. 40 CFR §60.25(e). The first progress report will be submitted to EPA one year after approval of the Commonwealth's Section 111(d)/129 State Plan for existing MWCs. At a minimum, the annual progress report will include the following elements required under 40 CFR §60.25(f):
AND
New Source Performance Standards for New Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs) (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Eb)
(NOT INCLUDED)
I, __________________________, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, hereby certify that two public hearings were held prior to adoption of the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan for large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs) in accordance with criteria specified in 40 CFR §60.23. I further certify that the MWC State Plan includes a list of persons who provided testimony at the hearings and written copies of their testimony.
Dated: ______________________
Signed: ___________________________________
Krishnan Ramamurthy, Chief
Technical Support Section
Permits Division
Bureau of Air Quality, PADEP
Pollutant or Parameter | Emission Limit for a Large MWC | Performance and Compliance Test Requirements |
---|---|---|
Opacity | 10 percent (6-minute average) | CEMS |
Carbon Monoxide* |
100 ppmv - 4-hour block arithmetic average MB/WW |
CEMS |
|
250 ppmv - 24-hour daily arithmetic average MB/RW |
CEMS |
Particulate Matter* |
27 mg/dscm (0.012gr/dscf) |
Annual test |
Nitrogen Oxides* |
205 ppmv 24 hour arithmetic average. MB/WW |
CEMS (only for sources to which emission standard
applies) |
|
250 ppmv 24 hour arithmetic average. MB/RW |
CEMS (only for sources to which emission standard
applies) |
Hydrogen Chloride* |
31 ppmv and 29 ppmv or 95 percent reduction by
8/25/2002 |
Annual test |
Sulfur Dioxide* |
31 ppm 24 hr geometric mean or 75 percent
reduction; 29 ppmv -8/25/2002 |
Annual test |
Cadmium* |
0.040 mg/dscm |
Annual test |
Lead* |
0.49 mg/dscm and 0.44 mg/dscm by 8/25/2002 |
Annual test |
Mercury* |
0.080 mg/dscm or 85% reduction |
Annual test |
Total Dioxin/Furans* |
60 ng/dscm (total mass) for ESP based control
device. |
Annual test |
|
30 ng/dscm (total mass) for non ESP based control
device. |
Annual test |
Load |
Not to exceed 110 percent of maximum load during
most recent dioxin/furan performance test. |
Continuous monitoring - 4 hr block arithmetic
average steam load. |
Temperature |
The maximum particulate matter control device
inlet temperature must not exceed more than 170 C the temperature during
the most recent dioxin/furan test. |
Continuous monitoring |
Notes:
* All emission limits are expressed at
7 percent oxygen, dry basis.
“MB/WW” means Mass Burn
Waterwall
“MB/RW” means Mass Burn
Rotary Waterwall
CEMS
means Continuous Emission Monitoring System
Facility
Name |
County |
Unit |
Capacity (TPD) a |
Unit Type b |
Air
Pollution Control
c |
Wheelabrator Falls Inc. |
Bucks |
1 |
750 |
MB/WW |
SD, FF, CI, SNCR |
(09-0013) |
|
2 |
750 |
MB/WW |
SD, FF, CI, SNCR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harrisburg Materials |
Dauphin |
1 |
360 |
MB/WW |
ESP |
(22-2007) |
|
2 |
360 |
MB/WW |
ESP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Ref-Fuel Company |
Delaware |
1 |
448 |
MB/RW |
SD, FF |
(Formerly Delaware County |
|
2 |
448 |
MB/RW |
SD, FF |
Resource Recovery Facility) |
|
3 |
448 |
MB/RW |
SD, FF |
(23-0004) |
|
4 |
448 |
MB/RW |
SD, FF |
|
|
5 |
448 |
MB/RW |
SD, FF |
|
|
6 |
448 |
MB/RW |
SD, FF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lancaster Resource Energy, |
Lancaster |
1 |
400 |
MB/WW |
FF, SD, LI |
Inc. |
|
2 |
400 |
MB/WW |
FF, SD, LI |
(36-2013) |
|
3 |
400 |
MB/WW |
FF, SD, LI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montenay Montgomery Ltd. |
Montgomery |
1 |
600 |
MB/WW |
FF, SD |
(46-0010) |
|
2 |
600 |
MB/WW |
FF, SD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
York County Solid Waste &. |
York |
1 |
448 |
MB/RW |
FF, SD, CId |
Resource Authority |
|
2 |
448 |
MB/RW |
FF, SD, CId |
(67-2006) |
|
3 |
448 |
MB/RW |
FF, SD, CId |
Notes:
a The capacity is expressed in
Tons Per Day (TPD) of refuse
b Mass Burn/Waterwall (MB/WW)
Mass
Burn/Rotary Waterwall (MB/RW)
c The Air Pollution Controls
(APC) listed are:
Electrostatic
Precipitator (ESP)
Fabric Filter (FF)
Spray Dryer (SD) “Scrubber”
Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
(SNCR)
Carbon Injection (CI)
Lime Injection (LI)
d Carbon injection commenced
in February 1997
Appendix E-1: Summary
Of Emissions From Wheelabrator Falls Inc., For The
Year 1997
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission Det. |
1 |
MB/WW |
750 tpd |
8,332 |
Carbon Monoxide |
26.675 ppm |
47.086 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.00338
gr/dscf* |
3.46 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
173.038 ppm |
501.79 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
5.989 ppmv |
13.78 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
15.722 ppm |
63.43 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
0.389 ug/dscm* |
0.000466 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.815 ug/dscm* |
0.00223 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
23.0 ug/dscm* |
0.0285 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
0.977 ng/dscm |
1.146 E-6 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
MB/WW |
750 tpd |
8,323 |
Carbon Monoxide |
25.937 ppm |
44.45 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
.00383 gr/dscf* |
5.55 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
172.703 ppm |
486.27 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
6.17 ppmv |
24.04 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
17.763 ppm |
69.59 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
2.558 ug/dscm* |
0.00302 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
31.515 ug/dscm* |
0.0377 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
8.695 ug/dscm* |
0.01038 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
1.59 ng/dscm |
1.93 E-6 |
Stack test |
Stack tests conducted on
August 11-15, 1997 and February 11-13, 1997
CEMS = Continuous Emission
Monitoring System
All emission limits are
expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis
* Average emission rate of
two stack tests
tpd = tons per day
tpy = tons per year
APPENDIX E-2: Summary of Emissions from Harrisburg
Materials, Energy, Recycling,
Resource and Recovery Facility
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission Det |
|
1 |
MB/WW |
360
tpd |
8784 |
Carbon Monoxide |
7.60 lbs/hr |
33.50 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
2.90 lbs/hr |
12.8 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
35.70 lbs/hr |
157.1 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
-- |
382.8 |
AP-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
27.90 lbs/hr |
122.9 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
-- |
0.039 |
AP-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
-- |
0.30 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
-- |
0.10 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
1157 ng/dscm |
4.78 E-4 |
June 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
MB/WW |
360 tpd |
6784 |
Carbon Monoxide |
10.60 lbs/hr |
36.00 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
4.06 lbs/hr |
13.80 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
59.10 lbs/hr |
200.6 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
-- |
294.7 |
AP-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
38.90 lbs/hr |
132.1 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
-- |
0.03 |
AP-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lead |
-- |
0.30 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
-- |
0.01 |
1996 AIMS |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
7074 ng/dscm |
2.40 E-3 |
July 1996 |
|
All emission limits are
expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis
lbs/hr = pounds per hour
tpd = tons per day
tpy = tons per year
APPENDIX E-3: Summary of Emissions from American Ref-Fuel
Company for
the Year 1997
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission det. .0 .000 |
1 |
MB/WW |
448 tpd |
7,525 |
Carbon Monoxide |
50.654 ppmv |
49.98 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0026 gr/dscf |
4.4 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
125.336 ppmv |
203.18 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
8.077 ppmv |
10.39 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
21.157 ppmv |
47.71 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
<0.102 ug/dscm |
<0.000074 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.44 ug/dscm |
0.0011 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
16.9 ug/dscm |
0.0123 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
1.19 ng/dscm |
1.009 E-6 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
MB/WW |
448
tpd |
7,141 |
Carbon Monoxide |
57.144 ppmv |
49.86 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0015 gr/dscf |
2.39 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
126.816 ppmv |
181.77 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
9.878 ppmv |
11.23 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
21.991 ppmv |
43.86 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
<0.104 ug/dscm |
<0.000068 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
2.27 ug/dscm |
0.0015 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
11.7 ug/dscm |
0.0077 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
2.19 ng/dscm |
1.64 E-6 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
MB/WW |
448
tpd |
7,085 |
Carbon Monoxide |
51.184 ppmv |
46.68 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.011 gr/dscf |
2.16 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
123.840 ppmv |
185.55 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
4.250 ppmv |
5.05 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
20.528 ppmv |
42.79 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
<0.213 ug/dscm |
<0.000136 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.79 ug/dscm |
0.0114 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
24.9 ug/dscm |
0.0163 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
0.744 ng/dscm |
5.83 E-7 |
Stack Test |
APPENDIX E-3(Continued): Summary of Emissions from American Ref-Fuel Company for the Year 1997
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission Det. |
4 |
MB/WW |
448 tpd |
7,398 |
Carbon Monoxide |
50.919 ppmv |
46.03 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0033 gr/dscf |
4.88 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
136.085 ppmv |
202.08 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
6.018 ppmv |
7.09 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
20.641 ppmv |
42.64 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
<0.113ug/dscm |
<0.000072 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.25 ug/dscm |
0.00079 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
26.5 ug/dscm |
0.0167 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
2.72 ng/dscm |
2.11 E-6 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
MB/WW |
448
tpd |
7,032 |
Carbon Monoxide |
46.824 ppmv |
45.54 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0015 gr/dscf |
2.18 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
129.690 ppmv |
207.25 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
7.727 ppmv |
9.79 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
22.298 ppmv |
49.57 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
<0.107 ug/dscm |
0.00007 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.88 ug/dscm |
0.0012 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
16.1 ug/dscm |
0.0104 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
28.6 ng/dscm |
2.39 E-5 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
MB/WW |
448
tpd |
6,984 |
Carbon Monoxide |
61.793 ppmv |
62.33 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0028 gr/dscf |
4.43 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
129.156 ppmv |
214.04 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
10.228 ppmv |
13.45 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
17.252 ppmv |
39.78 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
1.3 ug/dscm |
0.00091 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
0.931 ug/dscm |
0.00065 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
12.7 ug/dscm |
0.0089 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
16.0 ng/dscm |
1.39 E-5 |
Stack Test |
Stack test conducted on May
6-22, 1997
CEMS = Continuous Emission
Monitoring System
tpd = tons per day
tpy = tons per year
APPENDIX E-4: Summary of Emissions from Lancaster Resource
Energy, Inc., for the Year 1997
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission Det. |
1 |
MB/WW |
400 tpd |
8,247 |
Carbon Monoxide |
14.249 ppmv |
16.24 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.00365 gr/dscf* |
5.57 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
269.000 ppmv |
503.58 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
15.275 ppmv |
22.69 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
6.741 ppmv |
17.56 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
2.115 ug/dscm* |
1.37 E-3 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
39.88 ug/dscm* |
2.89 E-2 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
72.38 ug/dscm* |
4.81 E-2 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Dioxin/Furan |
0.60 ng/Nm3** |
1.37 E-7 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
MB/WW |
400
t/d |
8,034 |
Carbon Monoxide |
16.855 ppmv |
20.04 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.003 gr/dscf* |
4.13 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
267.271 ppmv |
522.02 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
5.006 ppmv |
7.76 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
3.242 ppmv |
8.81 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
0.818 ug/dscm* |
3.42 E-5 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
11.365 ug/dscm* |
1.21 E-3 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
39.60 ug/dscm* |
5.10 E-2 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Dioxin/Furan |
0.085 ng/Nm3** |
2.39 E-8 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
MB/WW |
400
tpd |
8,094 |
Carbon Monoxide |
14.820 ppmv |
17.19 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0049 gr/dscf |
1.44 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
267.937 ppmv |
510.48 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
14.940 ppmv |
22.59 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
5.622 ppmv |
14.90 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
0.375 ug/dscm* |
1.03 E-4 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
2.85 ug/dscm* |
4.89 E-3 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
37.02 ug/dscm* |
3.56 E-2 |
Stack |
|
|
|
|
Dioxin/Furan |
0.052 ng/Nm3** |
3.15 E-8 |
Stack |
Stack tests conducted on May
5-14, 1997 and November 3-7, 1997
All
emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis.
* Average emissions rate of two stack tests
** 1989 EPA Toxic Equivalencies expressed (TEQ)
30 ng/dscm total mass = 0.5 ng/dscm dioxin/furan TEQ
CEMS = Continuous Emission
Monitoring System
tpd = tons per day
tpy = tons per year
APPENDIX E-5:
Summary of Emissions from Montenay Energy Resources of
Montgomery County
Inc., for the Year 1997
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission Det. |
||||
1 |
MB/WW |
600
tpd |
8,005 |
Carbon Monoxide |
22.645 ppmv |
29.11 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.00068 gr/dscf |
1.37 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
249.557 ppmv |
527.01 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
25.399 ppmv |
45.52 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
9.874 ppmv |
29.01 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
1.15 ug/dscm |
0.00102 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Lead |
4.41 ug/dscm |
0.00388 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
45.0 ug/dscm |
0.0397 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
2.25 ng/Nm3 |
1.97 E-6 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2 |
MB/WW |
600 tpd |
7,971 |
Carbon Monoxide |
20.515 ppmv |
26.26 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.00054 gr/dscf |
1.112 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
241.155 ppmv |
507.06 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
24.537 ppmv |
40.94 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
7.470 ppmv |
21.85 |
CEMS |
||||
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
<1.07 ug/dscm |
<0.0095 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Lead |
2.92 ug/dscm |
0.0026 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
60.0 ug/dscm |
0.055 |
Stack Test |
||||
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
1.81 ng/Nm3 |
1.59 E-6 |
Stack Test |
||||
Stack test conducted on May 6-13, 1997
All
emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis
CEMS = Continuous Emission
Monitoring System
tpd = tons per day
tpy = tons per year
APPENDIX E-6:
Summary of Emissions from York County Solid waste & Refuse Refuse Authority, for the Year 1997
Unit |
Type |
Size |
Hrs/yr |
Pollutant |
Emission Rate |
Emission tpy |
Emission Det. |
1 |
MB/WW |
448
tpd |
7,870 |
Carbon Monoxide |
63.007 ppmv |
73.29 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0013 gr/dscf |
2.97 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
95.775 ppmv |
183.04 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
4.321 ppmv |
6.552 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
12.189 ppmv |
32.41 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
0.924 ug/dscm* |
0.000923 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
4.153 ug/dscm* |
0.00419 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
4.716 ug/dscm* |
0.00474 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
2.33 ng/dscm(av) |
1.826 E-6 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
MB/WW |
448 tpd |
8,059 |
Carbon Monoxide |
47.519 ppmv |
49.90 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.008 gr/dscf |
4.65 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
117.763 ppmv |
194.45 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
5.638 ppmv |
7.717 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
5.786 ppmv |
13.88 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
0.543 ug/dscm* |
0.000489 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.791 ug/dscm* |
0.00161 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
14.925 ug/dscm* |
0.0135 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
1.114 ng/dscm(av) |
7.97 E-7 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
MB/WW |
448 tpd |
7,843 |
Carbon Monoxide |
62.665ppmv |
69.50 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Particulate Matter |
0.0047 gr/dscf |
2.85 |
Stack Test |
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen Oxides |
108.209 ppmv |
197.17 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Hydrogen Chloride |
5.811 ppmv |
8.401 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide |
4.963 ppmv |
12.58 |
CEMS |
|
|
|
|
Cadmium |
0.4595 ug/dscm* |
0.000426 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Lead |
1.931 ug/dscm* |
0.00185 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
27.30 ug/dscm* |
0.0275 |
Stack test |
|
|
|
|
Total Dioxin/Furan |
1.909 ng/dscm(av) |
1.23 E-6 |
Stack test |
Stack
tests conducted on March 25-28, 1997, and September 21-23,1997
All
emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis
*
Average emission rates of two stack tests
CEMS = Continuous Emission
Monitoring System
dscf/min = dry standard
cubic feet per minute
tpd = tons per day
tpy = tons per year
Facility Name | Unit | Emission Ratea | Date Measured |
Wheelabrator Falls Inc. (09-0013) |
1 | 0.977 ng/dscm | Aug 13, 1997 |
2 | 1.59 ng/dscm | Aug 13, 1997 | |
The Harrisburg Materials, Energy, Recycling Resource and and Recovery Facility (22-2007) |
1 | 1157 ng/dscm | June 1-2, 1994 |
2 | 7074 ng/dscm | July 24-25, 1996 | |
1 | 321 ng/dscm** | November 12-13, 1997 | |
2 | 588 ng/dscm** | September 15-16, 1997 | |
American Ref-Fuel (Delaware County Resource Recovery Facility, formerly operated by Westinghouse) (23-0004) |
1 | 1.19 ng/dscm | May 15-16, 1997 |
2 | 2.19 ng/dscm | May 21, 1997 | |
3 | 0.744 ng/dscm | May 16, 19, 1997 | |
4 | 2.72 ng/dscm | July 24, 30, 1997 | |
5 | 28.60 ng/dscm | May 19, 21, 1997 | |
6 | 16.0 ng/dscm | May 15-16,1997 | |
Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority (36-2013) |
1 | 0.60 ng/Nm3* | May 6-7, 1997 |
2 | .085 ng/Nm3* | May 8, 1997 | |
3 | .053 ng/Nm3* | May 9-12, 1997 | |
Montenay Montgomery Ltd. (46-0010) |
1 | 2.25 ng/Nm3 | May 6-8, 1997 |
2 | 1.91 ng/Nm3 | May 6-7, 1997 | |
York County Solid Waste & Recovery Authority (67-2006) |
1 | 2.33 ng/dscm | Mar 25, 1997 |
2 | 1.114 ng/dscm | Mar 25, 1997 | |
3 | 1.909 ng/dscm | Mar 28, 1997 |
Pursuant
to 40 CFR §60.26, State Plans must show that States have legal authority to
carry out the plan including the authority to [a]dopt emission standards and
compliance schedules applicable to designated facilities and to enforce
applicable laws, regulations, standards, compliance schedules and seek
injunctive relief.
B. Enforcing Applicable Laws, Regulations,
Standards, and Compliance Schedules
D. Obtaining Information Necessary to
Determine Whether Designated Facilities are in Compliance with Applicable
Requirements.
to update the compliance review form. Subsection (e) provides that the Department
may establish a supplemental review form that may be used to update information
submitted to the Department on the compliance review form. 25 Pa. Code §127.412(e). In addition, subsection (k) requires the
owners and operators of designated facilities to have reasonable procedures in
place to insure that documented conduct and deviations are identified and made
part of the compliance review information submitted to the Department. 25 Pa. Code §127.412(k).
E. Requiring Owners or Operators to Install
Maintain and Use Emission Monitoring Devices and Make Periodic Reports
F. Making Available to the Public Emission
Data Correlated to Emission Standards
certain information that would “adversely
affect the competitive position of that person.” Such information includes the production or sales figures, or
methods, processes, trade secrets and intellectual property rights. Section 127.411(d) also provides that the
Department will implement the
requirements of this section consistent with the requirements in Section 112(d)
(relating to emission standards) and 114(c)(relating to availability of
records, reports and information to public; disclosure of trade secrets). 25 Pa. Code §127.411(d)
G.
Legal Authority to Enforce the EG Prior to the Issuance of a Permit
H. Legal Authority to Enforce Applicable
Requirements Following the Expiration of Operating Permits
intention to comply with the APCA. 35 P. S. §4007.1. If the permittee fails to comply with the
EG, the Department may withhold plan approvals or operating permits until the
owner or operator of a designated facility corrects violations of applicable
requirements, including Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act.
Dated:
___________________
Signed:
______________________________________
Appendix H: PA Air Pollution Control Act and Applicable
Permitting Regulations