The original copy of this report is available in downloadable MS Word format from: www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/aq/plans/clean_air_plans.htm





COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY





SECTION 111(d)/129 STATE PLAN

FOR LARGE MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS (MWCs)

Table of Contents

                                                                                                                                    Pages

I.              Background/Introduction                                                                                3

II.            Public Participation                                                                                         4

III.          Implementation of the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan                                    6

IV.          Emission Standards and other Requirements                                                7

V.            Compliance Schedule and Increments of Progress                                       10

VI.          Inventory of Designated Facilities                                                                  13

VII.        Emission Inventory For Designated Facilities                                              13

VIII.     Source Surveillance, Compliance Assurance and Enforcement                  14

IX.       Legal Authority to Implement the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan         16

Appendices

Appendix A: Emission Guidelines for MWC
Appendix B: Documentation of Public Participation Process
Appendix C: Emission Standards and General Requirements
Appendix D: Inventory of Large MWC Units
Appendix E: Emission Summaries from Large MWC Units
Appendix F: Post 1990 Dioxin/Furan Test Data from Large MWC Units
Appendix G: Legal Authority to Implement the State Plan
Appendix H: PA Air Pollution Control Act, and Applicable Permitting Regulations




SECTION 111(d)/129 STATE PLAN FOR LARGE MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS

I. BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION

II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION [40 CFR §60.23(f)]

III. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SECTION 111(d)/129 STATE PLAN

IV. EMISSION STANDARDS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS
[40 CFR §60.24 and 40 CFR §60.33b and 25 Pa. Code §122.3]

V. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AND INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS

VI. INVENTORY OF DESIGNATED FACILITIES [40 CFR §60.25(a)]

VII. EMISSION INVENTORY FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES [40 CFR §60.25(a)]

VIII. SOURCE SURVEILLANCE, COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE AND ENFORCEMENT

IX. LEGAL AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT THE SECTION 111(d)/129 STATE PLAN [40 CFR §60.26(a)]


Appendix A: Emission Guidelines for Existing Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs) (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Cb)

AND

New Source Performance Standards for New Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs) (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Eb)

(NOT INCLUDED)


Appendix B -2: Public Hearing Certification

I, __________________________, on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, hereby certify that two public hearings were held prior to adoption of the Section 111(d)/129 State Plan for large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs) in accordance with criteria specified in 40 CFR §60.23. I further certify that the MWC State Plan includes a list of persons who provided testimony at the hearings and written copies of their testimony.



Dated: ______________________

Signed: ___________________________________

Krishnan Ramamurthy, Chief
Technical Support Section
Permits Division
Bureau of Air Quality, PADEP


Appendix C: Emission Standards And General Requirements

Pollutant or Parameter Emission Limit for a Large MWC Performance and Compliance Test Requirements
Opacity 10 percent (6-minute average) CEMS
     

Carbon Monoxide*

100 ppmv - 4-hour block arithmetic average

MB/WW

CEMS

 

250 ppmv - 24-hour daily arithmetic average

MB/RW

CEMS

     

Particulate Matter*

27 mg/dscm (0.012gr/dscf)

Annual test

     

Nitrogen Oxides*

 

205 ppmv 24 hour arithmetic average. MB/WW

CEMS (only for sources to which emission standard applies)

 

250 ppmv 24 hour arithmetic average. MB/RW

CEMS (only for sources to which emission standard applies)

     

Hydrogen Chloride*

31 ppmv and 29 ppmv or 95 percent reduction by 8/25/2002

Annual test

     

Sulfur Dioxide*

31 ppm 24 hr geometric mean or 75 percent reduction; 29 ppmv -8/25/2002

Annual test

Cadmium*

0.040 mg/dscm

Annual test

     

Lead*

0.49 mg/dscm and 0.44 mg/dscm by 8/25/2002

Annual test

     

Mercury*

0.080 mg/dscm or 85% reduction

Annual test

     

Total Dioxin/Furans*

60 ng/dscm (total mass) for ESP based control device.

Annual test

 

30 ng/dscm (total mass) for non ESP based control device.

Annual test

     

Load

Not to exceed 110 percent of maximum load during most recent dioxin/furan performance test.

Continuous monitoring - 4 hr block arithmetic average steam load.

     

Temperature

The maximum particulate matter control device inlet temperature must not exceed more than 170 C the temperature during the most recent dioxin/furan test.

Continuous monitoring

Notes:

         * All emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis.

     “MB/WW” means Mass Burn Waterwall

     “MB/RW” means Mass Burn Rotary Waterwall

         CEMS means Continuous Emission Monitoring System



Appendix D: Inventory of Large MWC Units

 

 

Facility Name

 

County

 

Unit

Capacity (TPD) a

Unit

Type b

Air Pollution

Control c

Wheelabrator Falls Inc.

Bucks

1

750

MB/WW

SD, FF, CI, SNCR

(09-0013)

 

2

750

MB/WW

SD, FF, CI, SNCR

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harrisburg Materials

Dauphin

1

360

MB/WW

ESP

(22-2007)

 

2

360

MB/WW

ESP

 

 

 

 

 

 

American Ref-Fuel Company

Delaware

1

448

MB/RW

SD, FF

(Formerly Delaware County

 

2

448

MB/RW

SD, FF

Resource Recovery Facility)

 

3

448

MB/RW

SD, FF

(23-0004)

 

4

448

MB/RW

SD, FF

 

 

5

448

MB/RW

SD, FF

 

 

6

448

MB/RW

SD, FF

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lancaster Resource Energy,

Lancaster

1

400

MB/WW

FF, SD, LI

Inc.

 

2

400

MB/WW

FF, SD, LI

(36-2013)

 

3

400

MB/WW

FF, SD, LI

 

 

 

 

 

 

Montenay Montgomery Ltd.

Montgomery

1

600

MB/WW

FF, SD

(46-0010)

 

2

600

MB/WW

FF, SD

 

 

 

 

 

 

York County Solid Waste &.

York

1

448

MB/RW

FF, SD, CId

Resource Authority

 

2

448

MB/RW

FF, SD, CId

(67-2006)

 

3

448

MB/RW

FF, SD, CId

 

Notes:

a                 The capacity is expressed in Tons Per Day (TPD) of refuse

b                Mass Burn/Waterwall (MB/WW)

            Mass Burn/Rotary Waterwall (MB/RW)

c                The Air Pollution Controls (APC) listed are:

            Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)

            Fabric Filter (FF)

            Spray Dryer (SD) “Scrubber”

            Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR)

            Carbon Injection (CI)

            Lime Injection (LI)

d                Carbon injection commenced in February 1997


 

Appendix  E-1:     Summary Of Emissions From Wheelabrator Falls Inc., For The

                              Year 1997

 

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission Det.

1

MB/WW

750 tpd

8,332

Carbon Monoxide

26.675 ppm

47.086

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.00338 gr/dscf*

3.46

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

173.038 ppm

501.79

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

5.989 ppmv

13.78

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

15.722 ppm

63.43

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

0.389 ug/dscm*

0.000466

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.815 ug/dscm*

0.00223

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

23.0 ug/dscm*

0.0285

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

0.977 ng/dscm

1.146 E-6

Stack test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

MB/WW

750 tpd

8,323

Carbon Monoxide

25.937 ppm

44.45

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

.00383 gr/dscf*

5.55

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

172.703 ppm

486.27

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

6.17 ppmv

24.04

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

17.763 ppm

69.59

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

2.558 ug/dscm*

0.00302

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Lead

31.515 ug/dscm*

0.0377

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

8.695 ug/dscm*

0.01038

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

1.59 ng/dscm

1.93 E-6

Stack test

 

Stack tests conducted on August 11-15, 1997 and February 11-13, 1997

CEMS = Continuous Emission Monitoring System

All emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis

* Average emission rate of two stack tests

tpd = tons per day

tpy = tons per year


APPENDIX  E-2:   Summary of Emissions from Harrisburg Materials, Energy,    Recycling, Resource and Recovery Facility

 

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission Det

1

MB/WW

360 tpd

8784

Carbon Monoxide

7.60 lbs/hr

33.50

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

2.90 lbs/hr

12.8

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

35.70 lbs/hr

157.1

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

--

382.8

AP-42

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

27.90 lbs/hr

122.9

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

--

0.039

AP-42

 

 

 

 

Lead

--

0.30

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Mercury

--

0.10

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

1157 ng/dscm

4.78 E-4

June 1994

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

MB/WW

360 tpd

6784

Carbon Monoxide

10.60 lbs/hr

36.00

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

4.06 lbs/hr

13.80

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

59.10 lbs/hr

200.6

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

--

294.7

AP-42

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

38.90 lbs/hr

132.1

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

--

0.03

AP-42

 

 

 

 

Lead

--

0.30

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Mercury

--

0.01

1996 AIMS

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

7074 ng/dscm

2.40 E-3

July 1996

 

All emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis

lbs/hr = pounds per hour

tpd = tons per day

tpy = tons per year


APPENDIX  E-3: Summary of Emissions from American Ref-Fuel Company                                               for the Year 1997

 

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission det.

.0

.000

1

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,525

Carbon Monoxide

50.654 ppmv

49.98

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0026 gr/dscf

4.4

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

125.336 ppmv

203.18

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

8.077 ppmv

10.39

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

21.157 ppmv

47.71

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

<0.102 ug/dscm

<0.000074

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.44 ug/dscm

0.0011

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

16.9 ug/dscm

0.0123

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

1.19 ng/dscm

1.009 E-6

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,141

Carbon Monoxide

57.144 ppmv

49.86

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0015 gr/dscf

2.39

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

126.816 ppmv

181.77

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

9.878 ppmv

11.23

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

21.991 ppmv

43.86

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

<0.104 ug/dscm

<0.000068

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

2.27 ug/dscm

0.0015

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

11.7 ug/dscm

0.0077

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

2.19 ng/dscm

1.64 E-6

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,085

Carbon Monoxide

51.184 ppmv

46.68

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.011 gr/dscf

2.16

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

123.840 ppmv

185.55

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

4.250 ppmv

5.05

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

20.528 ppmv

42.79

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

<0.213 ug/dscm

<0.000136

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.79 ug/dscm

0.0114

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

24.9 ug/dscm

0.0163

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

0.744 ng/dscm

5.83 E-7

Stack Test

 


APPENDIX  E-3(Continued):  Summary of Emissions from American Ref-Fuel                                                                  Company for the Year 1997

 

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission Det.

4

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,398

Carbon Monoxide

50.919 ppmv

46.03

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0033 gr/dscf

4.88

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

136.085 ppmv

202.08

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

6.018 ppmv

7.09

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

20.641 ppmv

42.64

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

<0.113ug/dscm

<0.000072

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.25 ug/dscm

0.00079

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

26.5 ug/dscm

0.0167

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

2.72 ng/dscm

2.11 E-6

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,032

Carbon Monoxide

46.824 ppmv

45.54

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0015 gr/dscf

2.18

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

129.690 ppmv

207.25

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

7.727 ppmv

9.79

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

22.298 ppmv

49.57

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

<0.107 ug/dscm

0.00007

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.88 ug/dscm

0.0012

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

16.1 ug/dscm

0.0104

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

28.6 ng/dscm

2.39 E-5

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

MB/WW

448 tpd

6,984

Carbon Monoxide

61.793 ppmv

62.33

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0028 gr/dscf

4.43

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

129.156 ppmv

214.04

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

10.228 ppmv

13.45

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

17.252 ppmv

39.78

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

1.3 ug/dscm

0.00091

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

0.931 ug/dscm

0.00065

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

12.7 ug/dscm

0.0089

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

16.0 ng/dscm

1.39 E-5

Stack Test

 

Stack test conducted on May 6-22, 1997

CEMS = Continuous Emission Monitoring System

tpd = tons per day

tpy = tons per year


APPENDIX  E-4:  Summary of Emissions from Lancaster Resource Energy, Inc., for the Year 1997

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission Det.

1

MB/WW

400 tpd

8,247

Carbon Monoxide

14.249 ppmv

16.24

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.00365 gr/dscf*

5.57

Stack

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

269.000 ppmv

503.58

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

15.275 ppmv

22.69

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

6.741 ppmv

17.56

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

2.115 ug/dscm*

1.37 E-3

Stack

 

 

 

 

Lead

39.88 ug/dscm*

2.89 E-2

Stack

 

 

 

 

Mercury

72.38 ug/dscm*

4.81 E-2

Stack

 

 

 

 

Dioxin/Furan

0.60 ng/Nm3**

1.37 E-7

Stack

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

MB/WW

400 t/d

8,034

Carbon Monoxide

16.855 ppmv

20.04

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.003 gr/dscf*

4.13

Stack

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

267.271 ppmv

522.02

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

5.006 ppmv

7.76

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

3.242 ppmv

8.81

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

0.818 ug/dscm*

3.42 E-5

Stack

 

 

 

 

Lead

11.365 ug/dscm*

1.21 E-3

Stack

 

 

 

 

Mercury

39.60 ug/dscm*

5.10 E-2

Stack

 

 

 

 

Dioxin/Furan

0.085 ng/Nm3**

2.39 E-8

Stack

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

MB/WW

400 tpd

8,094

Carbon Monoxide

14.820 ppmv

17.19

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0049 gr/dscf

1.44

Stack

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

267.937 ppmv

510.48

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

14.940 ppmv

22.59

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

5.622 ppmv

14.90

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

0.375 ug/dscm*

1.03 E-4

Stack

 

 

 

 

Lead

2.85 ug/dscm*

4.89 E-3

Stack

 

 

 

 

Mercury

37.02 ug/dscm*

3.56 E-2

Stack

 

 

 

 

Dioxin/Furan

0.052 ng/Nm3**

3.15 E-8

Stack

 

Stack tests conducted on May 5-14, 1997 and November 3-7, 1997

All emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis.

*     Average emissions rate of two stack tests

**  1989 EPA Toxic Equivalencies expressed (TEQ)

30 ng/dscm total mass = 0.5 ng/dscm dioxin/furan TEQ

CEMS = Continuous Emission Monitoring System

tpd = tons per day

tpy = tons per year


APPENDIX  E-5:  Summary of Emissions from Montenay Energy Resources of

                         Montgomery County Inc., for the Year 1997

 

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission Det.

1

MB/WW

600 tpd

8,005

Carbon Monoxide

22.645 ppmv

29.11

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.00068 gr/dscf

1.37

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

249.557 ppmv

527.01

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

25.399 ppmv

45.52

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

9.874 ppmv

29.01

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

1.15 ug/dscm

0.00102

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

4.41 ug/dscm

0.00388

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

45.0 ug/dscm

0.0397

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

2.25 ng/Nm3

1.97 E-6

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

MB/WW

600 tpd

7,971

Carbon Monoxide

20.515 ppmv

26.26

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.00054 gr/dscf

1.112

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

241.155 ppmv

507.06

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

24.537 ppmv

40.94

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

7.470 ppmv

21.85

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

<1.07 ug/dscm

<0.0095

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Lead

2.92 ug/dscm

0.0026

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

60.0 ug/dscm

0.055

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

1.81 ng/Nm3

1.59 E-6

Stack Test

 

Stack test conducted on May 6-13, 1997

All emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis

CEMS = Continuous Emission Monitoring System

tpd = tons per day

tpy = tons per year


APPENDIX  E-6:   Summary of Emissions from York County Solid waste & Refuse     Refuse Authority, for the Year 1997

 

Unit

Type

Size

Hrs/yr

Pollutant

Emission Rate

Emission tpy

Emission Det.

1

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,870

Carbon Monoxide

63.007 ppmv

73.29

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0013 gr/dscf

2.97

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

95.775 ppmv

183.04

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

4.321 ppmv

6.552

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

12.189 ppmv

32.41

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

0.924 ug/dscm*

0.000923

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Lead

4.153 ug/dscm*

0.00419

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

4.716 ug/dscm*

0.00474

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

2.33 ng/dscm(av)

1.826 E-6

Stack test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

MB/WW

448 tpd

8,059

Carbon Monoxide

47.519 ppmv

49.90

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.008 gr/dscf

4.65

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

117.763 ppmv

194.45

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

5.638 ppmv

7.717

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

5.786 ppmv

13.88

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

0.543 ug/dscm*

0.000489

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.791 ug/dscm*

0.00161

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

14.925 ug/dscm*

0.0135

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

1.114 ng/dscm(av)

7.97 E-7

Stack test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

MB/WW

448 tpd

7,843

Carbon Monoxide

62.665ppmv

69.50

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Particulate Matter

0.0047 gr/dscf

2.85

Stack Test

 

 

 

 

Nitrogen Oxides

108.209 ppmv

197.17

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Hydrogen Chloride

5.811 ppmv

8.401

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Sulfur Dioxide

4.963 ppmv

12.58

CEMS

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

0.4595 ug/dscm*

0.000426

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Lead

1.931 ug/dscm*

0.00185

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Mercury

27.30 ug/dscm*

0.0275

Stack test

 

 

 

 

Total Dioxin/Furan

1.909 ng/dscm(av)

1.23 E-6

Stack test

                 

Stack tests conducted on March 25-28, 1997, and September 21-23,1997

All emission limits are expressed at 7 percent oxygen, dry basis

* Average emission rates of two stack tests

CEMS = Continuous Emission Monitoring System

dscf/min = dry standard cubic feet per minute

tpd = tons per day

tpy = tons per year

 



APPENDIX F: Post 1990 Dioxin/Furan Test Data From Large Existing MWC Units

Facility Name Unit Emission Ratea Date Measured
Wheelabrator Falls Inc.
(09-0013)
1 0.977 ng/dscm Aug 13, 1997
2 1.59 ng/dscm Aug 13, 1997
The Harrisburg Materials,
Energy, Recycling Resource
and and Recovery Facility
(22-2007)
1 1157 ng/dscm June 1-2, 1994
2 7074 ng/dscm July 24-25, 1996
1 321 ng/dscm** November 12-13, 1997
2 588 ng/dscm** September 15-16, 1997
American Ref-Fuel
(Delaware County
Resource Recovery Facility,
formerly operated by Westinghouse)
(23-0004)
1 1.19 ng/dscm May 15-16, 1997
2 2.19 ng/dscm May 21, 1997
3 0.744 ng/dscm May 16, 19, 1997
4 2.72 ng/dscm July 24, 30, 1997
5 28.60 ng/dscm May 19, 21, 1997
6 16.0 ng/dscm May 15-16,1997
Lancaster County Solid
Waste Management Authority
(36-2013)
1 0.60 ng/Nm3* May 6-7, 1997
2 .085 ng/Nm3* May 8, 1997
3 .053 ng/Nm3* May 9-12, 1997
Montenay Montgomery Ltd.
(46-0010)
1 2.25 ng/Nm3 May 6-8, 1997
2 1.91 ng/Nm3 May 6-7, 1997
York County Solid Waste &
Recovery Authority
(67-2006)
1 2.33 ng/dscm Mar 25, 1997
2 1.114 ng/dscm Mar 25, 1997
3 1.909 ng/dscm Mar 28, 1997
Note:



Appendix G: Legal Authority To Implement The State Plan


APPENDIX G
LEGAL AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT THE STATE PLAN [40 CFR §60.26(a)]

Pursuant to 40 CFR §60.26, State Plans must show that States have legal authority to carry out the plan including the authority to [a]dopt emission standards and compliance schedules applicable to designated facilities and to enforce applicable laws, regulations, standards, compliance schedules and seek injunctive relief.

 

It is my opinion that PADEP has sufficient statutory and regulatory authority under its plan approval, State operating permit and Title V permit programs to implement applicable requirements adopted under Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act, including those for municipal waste combustors (MWCs) and MSW landfills.  A copy of the Commonwealth’s Air Pollution Control Act (35 P.S. §4001 et seq.) and applicable regulations in 25 Pa. Code Article III (relating to air resources) for the plan approval, State operating permit and Title V permit requirements is attached hereto as Appendix H.

 

A.  Adoption of Emission Standards and Compliance Schedules

 

Pennsylvania’s Air Pollution Control Act and regulations promulgated thereunder provide authority for the PADEP to issue plan approvals, state operating permits and Title V permits to air contamination sources which incorporate “applicable requirements” and ensure compliance with “applicable requirements” of the CAA and regulations adopted under the act.  The term “applicable requirements” as defined in 25 Pa. Code §121.1 includes requirements which apply to a source at a Title V facility including a standard or other requirement under Section 111 of the CAA including subsection (d) and a standard or other requirement governing solid waste incineration under Section 129 of the Clean Air Act.  The Emission Guidelines for MWCs and MSW landfills are applicable requirements under state law.

 

Pursuant to  Section 6.1(a) of the APCA, no person can construct, assemble, install or modify an air contamination source nor install thereon an air pollution control device unless the person has obtained written approval from the PADEP.  35 P.S. §6006.1(a).  In addition, an applicant for a plan approval must demonstrate that the source will comply with applicable requirements of 25 Pa. Code Article III and requirements promulgated by the EPA under the CAA.  These statutory and regulatory requirements provide the necessary authority to incorporate the applicable requirements for designated facilities including MSW landfills and MWCs directly into plan approvals required under 25 Pa. Code §127.11 (relating to plan approvals).

 

Section 6.1(b) of the APCA provides that no person can operate any air contamination source unless the PADEP has issued to the source an operating permit in response to a written application to operate such sources. 35 P.S. §4006.1.  This statutory requirement implements the permitting requirements in 25 Pa. Code §§127.401-127.465 (relating to operating permit requirements) and 25 Pa. Code §§127.501-127.543 (relating to Title V Operating Permit requirements).

 

An applicant for a State operating permit or Title V permit must demonstrate that the source is complying with applicable requirements of 25 Pa. Code Article III (relating to air resources) and requirements promulgated under the CAA by the Administrator of the EPA.  25 Pa. Code §127.411(a)(5).  Section 127.411(a)(12) requires that operating permit applications contain a completed compliance review form or the applicant must provide a reference for the most recent compliance review form for facilities submitting compliance review forms on a periodic basis.  Each permit issued by the PADEP must, at a minimum, incorporate by reference the emission and performance standards and other requirements of the APCA, the CAA or the regulations promulgated under either act.  The provisions of  25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, Subchapter F (relating to operating permit requirements) are incorporated into the Title V permit requirements in 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, Subchapter G (relating to Title V operating permits).  Section 127.501 provides that Subchapter G “... describes the additional operating permit program requirements applicable to Title V facilities which are in addition to the requirements in Subchapter F ...”.

 

Section 6.1(b) of the APCA and implementing regulations authorize the PADEP to issue permits to noncomplying air contamination sources and to include in the plan approval or operating permit a schedule to achieve compliance with all applicable requirements of the CAA and the regulations promulgated under the CAA no later than the time frame specified by federal law.  35 P.S. §§4006.1(b)(3-4), 4007.2 and 25 Pa. Code §§127.403(c), 127.404, 127.411 and 127.445(a)-(f).

 

Additional statutory authority for the incorporation of applicable requirements into permits for designated facilities is derived from Section 6.1(k) of the APCA.  This provision authorizes the Department to revise any permit to incorporate applicable standards and regulations promulgated under the CAA after issuance of such permit. 35 P.S. §4006.1(k).  The implementing regulations are codified at 25 Pa. Code §§127.461, 127.463 and 127.542.

 

            B.  Enforcing Applicable Laws, Regulations, Standards, and Compliance Schedules

 

The PADEP has sufficient authority to enforce applicable requirements including Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA.  Section 7.1 of the APCA establishes a mandatory bar to the issuance of plan approvals or permits if the PADEP finds that a permittee has been placed on the Department’s compliance docket for violations of any requirement of the APCA and regulations adopted thereunder, any plan approval, permit or order of the Department. 35 P.S. §4007.1.

 

Section 7.2 of the APCA provides that permits issued to sources out of compliance with the APCA, the CAA or regulations promulgated under either act “must contain an enforceable schedule requiring the source to attain compliance.”  If the permittee fails to achieve compliance by the final compliance date, the permit shall terminate.  35 P.S. §4007.2.

 

Section 8 of the APCA provides that it shall be unlawful to fail to comply with the act, regulations adopted under the Act or fail to comply with any order of the Department, or any term or condition of a plan approval or permit.  35 P.S §4008.

 

In addition, Pennsylvania law provides civil and criminal enforcement authority for violations of the APCA, regulations including the assessment of penalties and fines under Sections 9 and 9.1 of the APCA.  Under Section 9.1(a), the PADEP may assess a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day for each violation of applicable requirements.  35 P.S. §§4009, 4009.1.

 

Section 10.1 of the APCA also authorizes the PADEP to issue enforcement orders to aid in the enforcement of the provisions of the Act or its implementing regulations.  Such orders shall include orders modifying, suspending, terminating, or revoking a Plan Approval or Operating Permit.  35 P.S. §4010.1.

 

C.  Seeking Injunctive Relief

 

Section 13 of the APCA specifies that a violation of the act or regulations, any order, plan approval or permit is a public nuisance and allows for the abatement of public nuisances.  35 P.S. §4013.

 

Section 13.6 of the APCA authorizes the PADEP to abate nuisances in the manner provided by law or equity for the abatement of public nuisances.  When circumstances warrant or public health is endangered, a mandatory preliminary injunction, special injunction or temporary restraining order may be issued upon the terms of prescribed by the court.  In such proceedings, upon a motion of the Commonwealth, the court shall issue a prohibitory or mandatory preliminary injunction if it finds that the defendant is engaged in unlawful conduct as defined by the APCA or is engaged in conduct which is causing immediate or irreparable harm.  The court may also levy penalties in accordance with Section 9.1 of the APCA.  See 35 P.S. §4013.

 

            D.  Obtaining Information Necessary to Determine Whether Designated Facilities are in Compliance with Applicable Requirements.

 

As required under 40 CFR §60.26(a)(3), the PADEP may obtain information necessary to determine compliance with applicable laws, regulations, standards and compliance schedules.  Section 7.1 of the APCA requires the Department to withhold a plan approval or permit if the applicant, permittee or a general partner, parent or subsidiary corporation of the applicant or permittee is in violation of the APCA, regulations adopted thereunder, a plan approval, permit or order of the Department.  35 P.S. §4007.1.

 

The owners or operators of designated facilities, including MSW landfills with design capacities of 2.5 million megagrams, must comply with the compliance review procedures established in 25 Pa. Code §127.412 and the compliance certification requirements established in 25 Pa. Code §§127.503, 127.512 and 127.513.

 

Section 127.412(c) requires that the compliance review form submitted to the Department include information related to compliance status of the applicant and “related parties.  The compliance review form must include a list of “documented conduct” and “deviations” by the plan approval or permit applicant or a “related party.”  The applicant or related party is required

to update the compliance review form.  Subsection (e) provides that the Department may establish a supplemental review form that may be used to update information submitted to the Department on the compliance review form.  25 Pa. Code §127.412(e).  In addition, subsection (k) requires the owners and operators of designated facilities to have reasonable procedures in place to insure that documented conduct and deviations are identified and made part of the compliance review information submitted to the Department.  25 Pa. Code §127.412(k).

 

Compliance certification provisions established under §127.503 include:

 

1)  certification by a responsible official that the facility is in compliance with applicable requirements or certification of compliance with “applicable requirements;”

 

2)  a schedule for submission of compliance certification during the permit term, to be submitted at least annually or more frequently if specified by the applicable requirement or by the Department.  25 Pa. Code §127.503(10).

 

Section 127.512(c)(5) provides that Title V permits shall require each permittee to furnish to the Department within a reasonable time, information that the Department may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit.

 

In accordance with §127.513, permits issued to Title V facilities must specify that upon presentation of credentials and other documents required by law, the permittee shall allow the PADEP or an authorized representative of the PADEP access to such facilities to inspect, at reasonable times, facilities and equipment including monitoring and  air pollution control equipment. 25 Pa. Code §127.513(2)(iii).  The Department also has authority to sample or monitor substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the terms of the permit or applicable requirements as authorized under the CAA, the APCA, or the regulations adopted under the acts. 25 Pa. Code §127.513(2)(iv).

 

            E.  Requiring Owners or Operators to Install Maintain and Use Emission Monitoring Devices and Make Periodic Reports

 

In accordance with §127.12(a)(3), plan approval applications  must show that the source will be equipped with reasonable and adequate facilities to monitor and record the emissions of air contaminants and operating conditions which may affect the emissions of air contaminants.  The applicant must also show that the records are being and will continue to be maintained and that the records will be submitted to the Department at specified intervals or upon request.  25 Pa. Code §127.12(a)(3).

 

Section 127.411(4)(i) provides that an applicant for an operating permit must demonstrate that the source is equipped with reasonable and adequate facilities to monitor and record the emissions of air contaminants and the operating conditions which may affect the emissions of air contaminants.  25 Pa. Code §127.411(a)(4)(i).

 

Section 127.441(a) provides that a permit may contain terms and conditions that the PADEP deems necessary to assure the proper operation of the source.  Subsection (c) specifies that “the operating permit shall incorporate the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements required by 25 Pa. Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing) and other requirements” of 25 Pa. Code Article III.  This subsection also provides that operating permits shall incorporate additional requirements related to the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting required by the Clean Air Act and the regulations thereunder.”  25 Pa. Code §127.441(c).  These requirements must be included in both State operating permits and Title V permits issued by the PADEP.  Therefore, Pennsylvania has adequate authority to include the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for designated facilities in State operating permits and Title V permits.

 

In addition, Section 127.442 provides that the permittee shall submit reports to the PADEP containing information prescribed by the PADEP relative to the operation and maintenance of a source.  At a minimum, each permit shall incorporate by reference the requirements of the APCA, the Clean Air Act, or applicable regulations adopted thereunder.

 

Pursuant to 25 Pa. Code §127.511(a), emission monitoring and analysis procedures or test methods required under applicable requirements, including procedures and methods under Sections 114(a)(3) or 504(b) of the Clean Air Act must be included as a condition in Title V permits.  With respect to emission monitoring, the permittee must also comply with requirements concerning the use, maintenance and, when appropriate, installation of monitoring equipment or methods, as necessary.  25 Pa. Code §127.511(a)(3).  At least every six months, the permittee must submit reports of required monitoring, certified by a responsible official of the designated facility.  Instances of deviations from permit requirements shall be clearly identified in the reports.  25 Pa. Code §127.511(c).

 

The previously described statutory and regulatory provisions demonstrate that PADEP has adequate authority to require the owners and operators of designated facilities including existing MSW landfills and certain MWCs to comply with the EG applicable to those facilities.  Furthermore, the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting provisions of 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts Eb and WWW are incorporated by reference in their entirety in 25 Pa. Code Chapter 122.  Consequently, the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the designated facilities including MWCs and MSW landfills have the force and effect of Pennsylvania law.

 

            F.  Making Available to the Public Emission Data Correlated to Emission Standards

 

 Section 13.1 of the APCA requires the Department to make all records, reports or information pertaining to emission data available to the public.  As specified in 25 Pa. Code §127.411(c) records, reports or information obtained by the Department or referred to a public hearings shall be available to the public, except as provided in subsection(d).  The exception in subsection (d) , which does not apply to emissions data, provides for the confidential treatment of

certain information that would “adversely affect the competitive position of that person.”  Such information includes the production or sales figures, or methods, processes, trade secrets and intellectual property rights.  Section 127.411(d) also provides that the Department will  implement the requirements of this section consistent with the requirements in Section 112(d) (relating to emission standards) and 114(c)(relating to availability of records, reports and information to public; disclosure of trade secrets).  25 Pa. Code §127.411(d)

 

In accordance with the requirements of 25 Pa. Code §§127.441(c) and 127.511 (b), State operating permits and Title V permits issued to designated facilities will incorporate the monitoring, recordkeeping or reporting requirements of Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing), 25 Pa. Code Article III and applicable emissions monitoring and analysis procedures or test methods required under the Clean Air Act including Sections 114(a)(3) or 504(b).

 

The owners or operators of designated facilities subject to Title V permit requirements must include the following emissions-related information in a Title V application which shall be made available to the general public:

 

1)  Emissions of air contaminants for which the facility is a Title V facility and emissions of regulated pollutants.  The permit application shall describe emissions of regulated air pollutants emitted from a stationary air contamination source.  The PADEP may also require additional information related to the emissions of air contaminants necessary to verify which requirements are applicable to each source.  25 Pa. Code §127.503(3)(i).

 

2)  Emission rates in tons per year and in terms necessary to establish compliance consistent with the applicable emission limit and standard reference test method.  25 Pa. Code §127.503(3)(iii).

 

Under 40 CFR §60.25, the emissions data summarized in State Plans developed pursuant to Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act must be correlated to emission standards for designated pollutants.  In Pennsylvania, emissions data correlated to emission standards are  available to the general public.  The correlated emission data will also be available for review by the general public when PADEP provides notice and opportunity for comment on the proposed plans.

 

            G.  Legal Authority to Enforce the EG Prior to the Issuance of a Permit

 

The Air Pollution Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder provide adequate authority for PADEP to enforce EG requirements developed pursuant to Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act prior to the issuance of a permit.  Section 6.1(k) of the Act provides that PADEP shall require revisions to any permit to incorporate applicable standards and regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act after the issuance of a Title V permit. 35 PS. §4006.1(k).  Therefore, the Department will revise existing State operating permits for designated facilities to incorporate “applicable requirements” including requirements in Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act in accordance with the provisions in 25 Pa. Code §127.463.  Section 127.463(e) also states that:  “Regardless of whether a revision is required under this section, the permittee shall meet the applicable standards or regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act within the time frame required by the standards or regulations.”

 

Subsection(e) expressly authorizes PADEP to require compliance with applicable requirements prior to the issuance of State operating permits or Title V permits to designated facilities.  Failure to comply with EG requirements subjects the owners or operators of designated facilities to appropriate enforcement action including the issuance of departmental orders and the assessment of civil penalties.  35 P. S. §§4004(9)(i), 4009.1 and 4010.1.

 

            H.  Legal Authority to Enforce Applicable Requirements Following the Expiration of Operating Permits

 

Pennsylvania law provides the necessary authority to enforce applicable requirements including Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act following the expiration of an operating permit issued by PADEP.  In this Commonwealth, air contamination sources may not operate without a permit.  Pursuant to Section 6.1(b.2) of the APCA and 25 Pa. Code §446(c), the terms and conditions of an expired permit are automatically continued pending the issuance of new permit if the permittee has submitted a timely and complete application and paid applicable fees.  35 P.S. §4006.1(b.2) and 25 Pa. Code §127.446(c).  The continued effect of expired permits applies to both state operating permits and Title V permits.

 

In circumstances where the owner or operator of a designated facility violates terms and conditions of the expired permit, the Department may issue enforcement orders including requiring the cessation of operation of a designated facility or any air contamination source at such facilities.  35 P.S. §§4004(9)(I) and 4010.1.

 

In Pennsylvania, it is unlawful to any operate stationary air contamination source without a permit.  Section 6.1(b)(1) of the APCA provides that “no person shall operate any stationary air contamination source unless the department shall have issued to such person a permit to operate such source in response to a written application ...”.  35 P.S. §4006.1(b)(1).  Therefore, if the owner or operator of a designated facility fails to submit an application to renew a State operating permit or Title V permit, the Department can initiate appropriate enforcement action upon expiration of the permit if the permittee continues to operate the stationary air contamination source after the permit lapses.

 

Section 9.1 of the APCA provides that the Department may assess up to $25,000 per day in civil penalties for violations of the act, regulations adopted under the act, departmental orders or terms and conditions of plan approvals and operating permits. 35 P.S. §4009.1.

 

The provisions described above provide sufficient authority to enforce applicable requirements prior to the renewal of state operating permits or Title V permits.  Additionally, Section 7.1 of the APCA authorizes the Department to withhold plan approvals, state operating permits or Title V permits where an applicant or related party has shown a lack of ability or

intention to comply with the APCA.  35 P. S. §4007.1.  If the permittee fails to comply with the
EG, the Department may withhold plan approvals or operating permits until the owner or operator of a designated facility corrects violations of applicable requirements, including Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act.

 

 

Dated:  ___________________

 

 

Signed: ______________________________________

   Terry R. Bossert, Chief Counsel, PADEP


Appendix H:  PA Air Pollution Control Act and Applicable Permitting Regulations