=======================Electronic Edition========================
RACHEL’S HAZARDOUS WASTE NEWS #370
—December 30, 1993—
News and resources for environmental justice.
==========
Environmental Research Foundation
P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403
Fax (410) 263-8944; Internet: erf@igc.apc.org
==========
The Back issues and Index are
available here.
The official RACHEL archive is here.
It’s updated constantly.
To subscribe, send E-mail to rachel-
weekly-request@world.std.com
with the single word SUBSCRIBE in the message. It’s
free.
===Previous
Issue==========================================Next
Issue===
SLAPPED
As the controversy over the toxicity of dioxin mounts, a
respected environmental writer on the subject is finding himself
defending a $4 million libel lawsuit filed by a retired Monsanto
Co. scientist. [1] Dr. Peter Montague, founder and director of the
grassroots-oriented Environmental Research Foundation, was sued
by Monsanto epidemiologist William Gaffey who claims he was
libeled in an article Montague wrote in the March 1990 issue
[RHWN #171] of RACHEL’S HAZARDOUS WASTE NEWS. The subject
of the
article was alleged fraud in dioxin studies conducted by Gaffey
and his Monsanto colleagues.
Montague’s supporters say the case is a classic SLAPP, a lawsuit
filed by a corporation to stifle citizen opposition (the acronym
stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation).
Prior to the lawsuit against Montague, Monsanto’s alleged fraud
was receiving widespread attention and even created momentum for
expanding payments to Vietnam veterans exposed to
dioxin-contaminated Agent Orange….
Montague based his article on a memo, “Newly revealed Fraud by
Monsanto,” prepared by EPA scientist Dr. Cate Jenkins.
Montague’s article also quoted documents from a lawsuit brought
by Missouri residents against Monsanto, which revealed numerous
discrepancies in the Monsanto studies.
The lawsuit could help resolve some of the controversy over
dioxin, since the key issue at trial is expected to be whether
what Montague wrote (and Jenkins alleged) is true or not….
Reached at his home in St. Louis, Gaffey said, “I’m afraid we’re
completely unable to talk until [the trial] is completely
finished or much further along.”
[This lawsuit is now pending in federal district court in St.
Louis; a trial date has not yet been set.]
[Happy New Year.]
                 
                 
                 
                 
–Peter Montague, Ph.D.
===============
[1] Except for items inside square brackets, this article and
headline are reprinted with permission from ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
(Winter, 1994), pg. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION is published
quarterly by Environmental Action Foundation, 6930 Carroll Ave.,
Suite 600, Takoma Park, MD 20912; phone (301) 891-1100.
Subscriptions are $25/year for individuals.
Descriptor terms: usphs; phs; public health service; barry l.
johnson; atsdr; agency for toxic substances and disease
registry; hazardous waste; health effects; morbidity; mortality;
birth defects; neurological disorders; neurotoxins; leukemia;
cardiovascular disease; dermatitis; superfund; leachate; epa;
environmental protection agency; trichloroethylene; tce;
gastrointestinal cancer; lung cancer; bladder cancer; esophagus
cancer; stomach cancer; colon cancer; rectal cancer; rectum;
trihalomethanes; thms; chlorination; drinking water; low birth
weight; heart defects; neural tube defects; cleft palate;
central nervous system; lawsuits; monsanto; william r. gaffey;
epidemiology; science; peter montague; dioxin; occupational
safety and health; slapps; strategic lawsuit against public
participation; agent orange; vietnam veterans; cate jenkins;
kemner;